We are seeing early- and even late-stage groups still booking interest-free related-party loans to “keep things simple.”
𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐚𝐱 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐬𝐞𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐞:
(1) transfer pricing risk (not arm’s length) and
(2) lost withholding tax where interest would otherwise be taxable.
𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐰?
• OECD guidance on financial transactions tightened expectations around pricing and substance.
• Many countries now presume interest-free loans are high-risk unless the facts look like equity.
• Some (or should we say most!) jurisdictions even impute “deemed interest” (and WHT!) on interest-free inbound loans (one of the top three start-up traps in our point of view).
𝐃𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐧 0% 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞?
Not necessarily—but only if the funding is accurately characterized (e.g., equity/quasi-equity) and the commercial reality supports it.
Otherwise, expect imputed interest, potential WHT exposure, and messy adjustments.
𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐩𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐞𝐬?
• The funding is actually equity/quasi-equity → then call it equity and stop calling it a loan, or
• It is a loan → then the lender needs a return (cash interest, original issue discount, or value via a conversion right). If there is no real return, tax authorities can impute interest and may trigger withholding tax.
• Model WHT and cash impacts up front—sometimes a small margin + treaty relief beats the audit headache.
At Visions Africa, we continue to help founders, CFOs, and finance leaders strike the right balance between speed of capital and regulatory compliance across emerging markets.
For many entrepreneurs in Rwanda, navigating compliance requirements can feel overwhelming—especially in the early stages of building a business. One of the most common areas
Many Rwandan organizations pay their female staff the legally required 14 weeks of full salary for maternity leave. That’s excellent corporate citizenship! But here is
